Back to the Newsletters Page

May 2009 - The Depression Update

The worst is over, and things will gradually start improving from here is the view of the twits writing in my local paper. On the other hand, someone complained to me the other day "if just one more person mentions green shoots to me I'll hit him".

So, is it all starting to get better..... or not?

Several things stand well out from the crowd. The US is the world's major economy, and if the American consumer slows his consuming, world trade slows. Look at Japan and China, both in one hell of a mess because American purchases have slowed drastically. China can recover, but not that fast. They have their own market to cater for, and that will keep them happily chugging for some time, but that wont take the place of the US consumer for 5-7 years at the earliest.

Japan is different, they will live on savings for another decade, but the economy wont be going anywhere soon.

However, that means the two biggest investors in US debt are probably going to stay away from the bond auctions.

US housing is still down by its worst amount in decades. There is more to come, a lot more. The Alt-A mortgages are due to reset next year and in 2011. In fact the resets peak in 2011. That means more loss of wealth, more folks unable to pay their way, more bankruptcies, less consumption.

We are also just entering the commercial real estate fiasco. We have already had two mall owners go down. There are more to come, and with them a whole slew of commercial real estate.

With all that hanging over the market, wealth is still vanishing in the USA at a mega rate of knots. And who is going to pay (and how) for all the bailouts? No country can move forward by supporting bankrupt companies. You should support the new dynamic ones. You also do not support a system that requires the spending of $2 to make $1, which is where the US currently is. That insanity will lead to total bankruptcy of the country if continued.

When did you last hear of a country whose currency was the reserve currency having their creditworthiness demoted from AAA? Moody's has already warned they are going to downgrade US credit-worthiness. That will put the cat among the pigeons.

How does the US pay for their own mess? Either borrowing from China through bond issuance, or printing money. The former is becoming increasingly difficult, and can only be sustained if interest rates rise, which will undoubtedly happen if the rating drops to AA. The second traditionally causes inflation, which also causes interest rates to rise. Rising interest rates kill the property market, and bankrupt those who got in when rates were artificially low.

If we are headed for deflation, then low interest rates will help real estate, and landlords will prosper. If we are headed for inflation, then interest rates will crucify us, but after that house prices will rise to mirror the inflationary fall in the value of money. In short, under that scenario those with property will prosper so long as interest rate rises dont wipe them out first.

I dont see good times coming to a theatre near me any time soon. Look at this for godsake!

"The IMF estimates that the cost of the current crisis to the United States will eventually reach 34% of GDP or close to $5 trillion. However, the Obama administration, through its various implicit and explicit guarantees, is already using a number close to $9 trillion. And Reinhart and Rogoff's historical average of 86% of GDP implies an ultimate cost of over $12 trillion!

The true cost is important, because it has to be financed through new bond issuance, and it is my thesis that the sheer size of this tsunami will eventually overwhelm the world's bond markets. Even using the relatively conservative IMF estimates, the twelve largest industrialized countries of the world will have to issue about $10 trillion worth of new bonds to cover the cost of the current crisis.

However, if you (like me) believe that IMF underestimates the true cost of this crisis, Reinhart and Rogoff offer a more realistic approach. Using their least costly case study (Malaysia 1997) as our best case scenario, the true cost comes to $15 trillion. If one uses the average of 86% instead, the cost jumps to a whopping $33 trillion. I didn't even bother to produce a worst case scenario - it all got too depressing!

I need to put the $33 trillion into perspective. Total global savings (loosely adjusted for the big losses in 2008) are probably somewhere in the region of $100 trillion. In other words, financing this crisis could absorb one-third of total global savings."
- Niels Jensen. Outside the Box. May 11.

An alternative way of putting that is: paying back all this debt is going to empoverish everyone for a very long time. The Irish finance minister recently claimed it would take 10 years of tax receipts to pay for Ireland's existing bailout. And, being a politician, he is probably under-estimating. So the Irish aren't going to be big spenders for some time.

I think the important indicator is going to be how those balance sheets recover, or not. But how are we to find out? At the moment there is massive fudging. Just look at this. I missed a mortgage payment at the beginning of the year. I have an insurance claim that I thought was agreed, but the costs issue was unresolved so until that was sorted I couldn't collect my dosh. That put out all my housekeeping. I have only just resolved it. Meanwhile my bank was busy. Please note I did not ask for what happened next.

My bank emailed me asking me to make them a request for €35,000 to be placed in a savings account. They would use that savings account to fund my mortgage payments for the next 18 months. I haven't signed anything yet, so haven't seen the small print, but I am assured there is nothing nasty in the terms.

"But why?" I asked.

"Because the bank's balance sheets are not good. We have many customers who cant pay their mortgages. We are offering them all this deal, so our balance sheets dont look so bad."

"But what happens in 18 months? I will be okay, but what about the others?"

"Ah, but you see, this crisis will be over in 18 months so it wont matter then."

Go figure, as they say t'other side of the pond.

This is happening all over Europe. In 18 months time there is going to be another banking crisis in Europe. What then?

Guys, this is one hell of a mess! I'm keeping only property that is very lowly geared; less than 50%. My cash I am putting into high return quick get-out situations. I'm nervous, and I'm staying nervous. It's safer that way. I've been right every time about these things for the past 45 years. This is the first time I'm hoping to be wrong, but I dont see how I can be.

I am not saying dont go into real estate. What I am saying is, keep your gearing as low as possible, and make sure you get a good income from whatever you buy, otherwise you will be wiped out when interest rates rise. If you feel we are all entering a Japanese-like stagflation then load up with everything you can because interest rates will be on the floor for a decade or more. Now, if only I hadn't broken my crystal ball!

best wishes
john

Back to the Top

© The Property Organisation 2009